Disrupt Education, Recreate Society
YCC organsied a contest on Disruption as a prelude to the 11th Global Communication conclave and the YCC Convlave held at Bengaluru. The contest has attracted an overwhelming response from across the mass communication student community.
Here, we present, prize winning entries for the readers of GenX Hangout!
Disrupt Education, Recreate Society
By
Sheelu Alex
(First
Prize, Saint Teresa's College Ernakulam, Kerala)
Ruptures
are unlike raptures; they are not easy. Without notice, without warning, ruptures
happen, and in the blink of an eye, you find yourself trying to balance on a
hanging bridge, suspended between the vast emptiness of the sky and the bleak
roughness of the terrain. You see enraptured people coming up, wondering what
is new, spending some of their time to stare at you, sometimes a few seconds
more to observe you but none to step along with you into the uncertain
position.
Don’t
give up! Challenge! Rupture! Disrupt! Innovate! Create! And you resurrect a new
era where people gather courage to recreate your ripples of disruption and reconstruction.
Is
Education in dire need of an imminent disruption? What is education? Is
education synonymous with learning? Or is it a vocation to be placed on a
pedestal higher than learning? How can you confirm that a person is well
educated; by the length of his oratory, by the breadth of his knowledge or by
the height of his character? Is the present educational system proficient in
addressing the demands of the swirling times? Or does the institutionalisation
of education cripple its aims, chain its potential, and serve itself as its
meal? Then, what is the remedy for the educational institutions to overcome its
own cannibalism? Is the total destruction of the institutional system a
practical solution? Is it ever possible to disrupt institutions and return to
the long lost traditions of education? How far will the knowledge-thirsty, tech-savvy
population of the globe accept the notion of a return? Wouldn’t the choice
appear as a decline, a degradation? It is in this state of dilemma and
uncertainty, that I suggest the option of the hanging bridge.
| Inauguration of the Conclave - YCC Chairperson Geetha Shankar lighting the lamp |
Spare
a look at the techniques of the fashion industry; how they mould their products
to fit the requirements of the traditional minds and also the liberal ones. Nowadays,
the question of wearing a gown for weddings and functions seems to be a highly
inflammatory one, at least in some of our societies, precisely because of its dissociation
with our culture and the subsequent association with the Western culture. However,
it strikes me with wonder to think that the fashion industry rose above the
confusion with a remedy by offering a bridge between the two – the traditional
minds who scorn the gown wearers and the liberal minds who dream of being the
princess in the gown – through the introduction of floor length anarkali frocks. I must agree that in
structure, the clothing looks like a traditional salwar or churidar. But you will not disagree with me that, in essence, it has
the power to bestow the pride of a gown wearer to its owner, although the
realization is calm and subtle.
Disruption
is amiable if it comes from within and manifests itself in subtle ways but with
magnanimous effects. Destruction of institutions is impossible because it is
deeply rooted, gripping the soil of its growth in its teeth firmly and surely. What
is possible is the disruptive influence of a few elements of the educational
system, for example a few teachers or students with the potential to construct
a rupture, in such a way that it doesn’t destroy the entire system but develop
and strengthen the structure by filling the missing links. The disruptive
influence will be useful if the consequence is constructive, like the example
discussed from the fashion industry; if the disruption maintains the structure
but subtly change the essence.
However,
given the Indian scenario, disruption is easily said than practised. Though a
diversity constitute the population of India, the educational system is a well
structured institution with less rules written and more unwritten. In the mind of
the Indian students, the teacher holds a tyrannical position even when he/she
doesn’t want to. The teacher is positioned as the point of convergence, where
knowledge not only originates but also ends. The student perceives the teacher
and the prescribed texts as the beginning and the end and refuse to look
beyond.
However,
it should not be forgotten that the Indian culture had an inherent tendency to idolize anything that required
importance or respect. But the aura of the ultimate which earlier meant only to
render synonymous the teacher with the need to respect knowledge, now lulls the
learners/students into a kind of passivity; a passivity that dissuades the learner
from cooperation in the collective search for knowledge. The first step of disruption
in the educational system that enables this collective search is the
destruction of the false image of the teacher; the tendency to eulogise the teacher
as the sole source of all knowledge. Emerson says, “Meek young men grow up in
libraries, believing it their duty to accept the views, which Cicero, which
Locke, and which Bacon, have given, forgetful that Cicero, Locke, Bacon were
only young men in libraries, when they wrote these books”.
The
rupture begins when the students begin to understand that these teachers who
rise above the crowd, were students like them at some point in their life, who chose
to read through the books and understand them on their own, sometimes even more
than what the syllabus required of them. It is the dawning of this wisdom that
enables each student to cause a disruption in the educational system, by
blending the respect for the teacher’s will to power and the search for
knowledge even before the lecture, deriving motivation from the teacher.
The
second point of rupture dawns with the realization that the real aim of education
is not to grant good scores in exams but to prepare us for life. Therefore, the
knowledge we seek through education should not be merely gathered from the pages
of the textbook, but also from the words and actions of the teachers and the
students. Any words without action and any knowledge without practice is
worthless. Words take fruit from the action and practice root the knowledge in
our mind and prepare it for further analysis. Unfortunately, the present
educational system is rooted less in action and practice, that the knowledge
stays active in the students’ minds only till the completion of the exams. Such
knowledge do not find a space for analysis and recreation by incorporating the
involvement or contribution from the part of the students. The possessors of
this knowledge function more or less like the machines replicating multiple
copies without novelties. This practice cultivated by the educational
institutions find a parallel in the real lives where the focus is more on the
present without analysing its consequences for the future. However, this machine
life which focuses primarily on the immediate consequences is dangerous. The
excess concentration on the present and the complete denial of the future can
be tragic. Therefore, the present educational system must valorise the score
less and uphold life more. To facilitate ‘education for life’, the teaching in
educational institutions should be re-directed towards activities and
programmes that sustain the acquired knowledge in the mind of the students and
make it suitable for analysis and recreation. Activities that can keep the
acquired knowledge active should be devised. Linking the subject of study with
the current happenings and the experiences of life is one way. Real time
exhibitions can be helpful in terms of science subjects. Science parks and planetarium,
which use the principles of science to create a fantasy world for children and where
the written principles of science come alive, makes them realise that what they
study is related to their life as well. Apart from the positive effects, it is
also important to show children some of the dangerous effects of science. These
dangerous effects, when effectively incorporated into exhibitions, demonstrate
clearly the pros and cons of using scientific technology. As for literature, an
hour can be allotted in the teaching schedule, where students are encouraged to
explore the different structures available for the composition of books. Online
bases, where the students can see the front and the back covers of the book,
can encourage students to think about the theme of the books. Such approaches can
align the thought processes of students towards an interdisciplinary bend of mind
by associating the picture on the front cover and the title. As for the humanities
subjects, the interaction with the subject under study is important to keep the
knowledge active for a longer duration. Students should be encouraged to
perform field studies. Moreover, the importance of education lies in the
realization of the need for an interdisciplinary approach to subjects. In the
present times, the separation between the arts and the sciences is highly inflammable.
An amazing inter-disciplinary approach that has the potential to resolve this
conflict in education can be witnessed in the Kochi Muziris biennale. Visiting
the historical as well as the geographical sites, which appear as pictures in
their textbooks, can help to root the places in their minds.
The
third point of rupture I would like to discuss, Information technology, is not
just in the queue; it is already in play, on stage. The excess interest of the
new generation towards the technologies of communication and information should
be effectively channelled towards the aims of education. Social network groups
can be efficiently used to collect and share knowledge. Mass psychology is an
important trigger in the social media and persuades the group members to search
for newer knowledge to post online, when part of a social media group. The emerging
trend of short film making using the available materials if properly nurtured
can serve as a potent source of referential videos, capable of inspiration and
education . Smart classes are already on the show, where students have an
opportunity to see, to hear and to touch what they learn. Compared to the
earlier times, the opportunities for gathering knowledge is immense. There are
numerous discussion forums available online, with a panorama of objectives
ranging from enabling students to gather knowledge, involving in participatory
research, to sharing ideas.
As
you know, most of these educational techniques are not very recent; they have
been part of life and part of education for quite a long time. In modern times
when technology rules the world, the success of education lies in the effective
incorporation of these aids into the system. It is true that the lower grades
of the educational system has already integrated these aids into the curriculum
through the continuous and comprehensive evaluation of students. However, these
aids enjoy only an optional status in the higher grades. Some value is allotted
to them but the status offered does not assure them of an equal standing with the
subjects. Why are the educational institutions unable to introduce them on a
larger scale? The cause of this lack can be traced back to the existing unwritten rules of education. Most of the educational institutions have inherited
the legacy of good scores as the only visible evidence of success. The best way
to rupture this complacency is to strike at its roots- the importance given to
grades and scores, solely in terms of exams written. The allotment of scores to
the extra curricular and field activities encourage students to participate in
them as well. Therefore, the practical aspect of education should not be
incorporated into the syllabus as an option but as something compulsory. Giving
the development outside the text an equal standing with the development inside
the text is important to beat the tribulations of the times. Therefore, the
disruption in education should aim at an effective blending of the chosen
strategies diplomatically; a cautious fusion of tradition and modernity. Focus
should be laid on the incorporation of these strategies into the higher
education initiatives because we live in a world that no longer need
bibliomaniacs but flesh and blood professionals, capable of handling a myriad
circumstances. As Maya Angelou, the Afro – American writer said, “If you are
always trying to be normal, you will never know how amazing you can be.”
Comments
Post a Comment